Travis build was introduced after discovering compilation error in our few tests after se boot refactoring. I plan to let it's introduction as any isolated commit when merging.
It doesn't have any impact or API it spec content.
At this point, I'm fine with #290, though I'm not sure why its introducing travis builds. I hope that no new issues pop up after renaming the class with #296, I plan to push up javadocs and spec changes this evening.JohnHi All,
The release is still in 2 weeks and we have still 2 PR to close.
I'm still waiting +1 or feedback on https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/290 to merge it or amend it.
There is still discussion going on John's PR : https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/296
I propose that we set up an hangout meeting on Monday or Tuesday to solve this.
cdi-dev mailing list
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.