As you know we plan to release CDI 2.0 before the end of January. It let's us around 6 months to complete the spec.

I think we really should find a way to enhance our focus on reviewing proposal and code.

Adding special Hangout meetings proved itself a good solution to go that way, but I think we should also work on rules adoption for PR.

So I propose that:

- PR should stay open at least one week.

- It could be merged (after at least a week) if 4 EG members votes for it (+1 on the PR).

- As no one is error proof if someone has an objection to a PR to be merged he could raise his concern and justify his objection.

- The following discussion should lead either to a revision of the PR or a +1 from the objector

- If no agreement is reached, to avoid blocage a vote will be called on this ML to adopt or reject the PR. 

I'm not a big fan of over processed team work, but we really have to deliver. 

For the moment I think we can avoid having too much process on ticket choice (we don't have enough contributors to go that way)

Wdyt ?

Antoine