Agreed but this approach of splitting things too much seems overly complicated to me. Let's not tie the bean defining annotation definition to the @Scope/@NormalScope meta-annotation presence. Let's instead say that all normal scopes are bean defining annotations. It will then be implicit that an annotation is a bean defining if either it is annotated with @NormalScoped or is added as BeforeBeanDiscovery.addScope(MyFirstScope.class,true,<true | false>)

Jozef

On 03/19/2014 04:30 PM, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
Hi all,

Im’ back with the main subject of this MR.

To resolve CDI-377 we decided to exclude from the « Bean defining annotations » set, all Pseudo Scope type (scope annotation having the meta annotation @Scope) except @Dependent.
So all normal scope annotation (built-in and user defined) are Bean Defining Annotation.

Now what about a normal scope added with :

1) BeforeBeanDiscovery.addScope(MyFirstScope.class,true,<true | false>) ?

And a pseudo scope added with : 

2) BeforeBeanDiscovery.addScope(MySecondScope.class,false,<true | false>) ?


For me MyFirstScope (defined in 1) should be a bean defining annotation while MySecondScope shouldn’t. 

Any thought ?

Antoine



_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev