On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir@redhat.com> wrote:

I've received a lot of feedback at JavaOne that XML config is something people want to see in the standard. So I would like to revisit this question.

Feel free to discuss now, or I'll start with a proposal in a few weeks :-)

On 5 Oct 2011, at 23:43, Mark Struberg wrote:

> Fine thing.
>
> Although I see a few issues which I'd rather like to keep off core CDI as they are very easy to implement as portable Extensions (e.g. the XML config stuff CDI-123).
>
> We really must take care that we don't add things which bloats the CDI core spec with 20 pages which are hard to get right.
>
>
> Instead we should really focus on things which are fundamental basics and thus cannot be done via a portable Extension.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Pete Muir <pmuir@redhat.com>
>> To: cdi-dev <cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2011 2:21 AM
>> Subject: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1 EDR1 posted :-)
>>
>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/ContextsAndDependencyInjection11EarlyDraftSubmitted
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>

_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

--
Rick Hightower
(415) 968-9037
Profile