+1 for both points.

kr
fabien

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir@redhat.com> wrote:
Yes, but the PMO told me I needed a unanimous vote I think ;-)

Sorry for the extra work!

On 7 Dec 2011, at 15:16, Mark Struberg wrote:

> +1
>
> (we already voted on this, didn't we?)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Pete Muir <pmuir@redhat.com>
>> To: Joseph Bergmark <bergmark@us.ibm.com>; norman.erck@holisticon.de; mathieu.ancelin@gmail.com; George Gastaldi <gegastaldi@gmail.com>; Richard Hightower <richardhightower@gmail.com>; Werner Keil <werner.keil@gmx.net>; Jérôme Petit <jerome.petit@serli.com>; Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine@sabot-durand.net>; Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>; Sivakumar Thyagarajan <sivakumar.thyagarajan@oracle.com>
>> Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2011 11:18 AM
>> Subject: Moving to JSR-348
>>
>> Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine, Mark, Siva,
>>
>> We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
>>
>> The JCP PMO have raised two points:
>>
>> 1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page
>> http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
>> 2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members. We've
>> not used that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you to
>> remove that private alias.
>>
>> Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at
>> https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to subscribe to
>> cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev anyway.
>>
>> Pete
>>


_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev



--
http://www.suntriprecords.com