I can confirm, in my example for routing events, the BookingBean injected into a BookingMDB and listening Observer class also had to be @RequestScoped.

Werner 


On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:03 PM, <cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org> wrote:
Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to
        cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        cdi-dev-owner@lists.jboss.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: JMS 2.1: Proposal to allow any CDI managed bean in a Java
      EE application to listen for JMS messages (Nigel Deakin)
   2. Re: JMS 2.1: Proposal to allow any CDI managed bean in a Java
      EE application to listen for JMS messages (John D. Ament)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:10:11 +0000
From: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] JMS 2.1: Proposal to allow any CDI managed bean
        in a Java EE application to listen for JMS messages
To: Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin@oracle.com>,     arjan tijms
        <arjan.tijms@gmail.com>,        Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID:
        <CAOqetn8LhNvq+4ELzuq-MLA3=6eVP3-k_AMQ8502=ag4jy4ZCg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 6:53 AM Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin@oracle.com>
wrote:

> On 26/08/2015 10:51, arjan tijms wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > <rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Agree for provided scope but JMS + short time scopes will not match
> well in
> >> practise so i would worry more about not "default" scopes which can miss
> >> these events.
> >
> > Short lived scopes like @RequestScoped may not be the best match indeed.
> >
> > Additionally, @RequestScoped is kinda assumed to be an "@ThreadScoped"
> > thing, e.g. there's the expectation that only the current thread will
> > access it. If the JMS provider will asynchronously call a method on
> > the bean instance from another thread, then this breaks this
> > assumption.
>
> That's an interesting point. Is there anything in the CDI spec which would
> forbid the use of a @RequestScoped JMS
> listener bean from another thread?
>

The CDI spec still mandates that a request scope is started for delivery to
MDBs.  See http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#request_context

The JMS provider would be responsible for retrieving a contextual reference
to the bean and then invoking the method.  The container should still be
responsible for starting the request context (If I read this correctly).

Likewise, we could say that a @TransactionScoped bean also applies here,
since a JTA transaction should have been started by the RA.


>
> Perhaps all that is needed is to make it clear to users that this is what
> would happen. The same issue would arise if
> the user injected a dependent-scoped JMS listener bean into a
> @RequestScoped bean.
>
> It's worth considering threading more generally. Although the JMS provider
> (resource adapter, actually) can make sure
> that the callback method won't be called from multiple JMS provider
> threads at the same time, it can't guarantee that an
> application thread won't be calling a business method on the bean at the
> same time. (Would it want to?)
>
> Nigel
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150826/bb408008/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html).  For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.

End of cdi-dev Digest, Vol 57, Issue 24
***************************************