Hi guys,
I posted modification on PR 290 [1] according to last meeting.
I still have 2 points that stays open for me (you may have more) :
- Place and name of the package: should we decide to package SE support in a specific jar, it will be probably better to have a better package name at a higher level
- Name for CDISE class. Perhaps using Container or SeContainer would be better. WDYT ?
Antoine