They are not "open" they are "unread". And it seems every EG member or contributor in a particular team get them and have to confirm them (as read), regardless of being closed/merged or not.

Werner



On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Matej Novotny <manovotn@redhat.com> wrote:
I have no idea what are u talking about.
I cannot see any PR which would still be "Open".
The one you linked was actually merged, what's wrong about that?

Matej

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Werner Keil" <werner.keil@gmail.com>
> To: "Martin Kouba" <mkouba@redhat.com>
> Cc: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 1:20:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI spec github repo cleanup
>
> Looks like those are mostly PRs you have to acknowledge before they go away
> like https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/349#event-893299947
>
>
>
> Werner
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Martin Kouba < mkouba@redhat.com > wrote:
>
>
> There are no GH issues in cdi-spec/cdi repository (CDI API + document).
>
> cdi-spec/ cdi-spec.org contains the sources for the website.
>
> Martin
>
> Dne 25.1.2017 v 13:07 Werner Keil napsal(a):
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Speaking of GitHub, what are those GH issues that remain unsolved for a
> very long time now? Are they for a next version or why did they sit
> there for a few months now?
>
> Werner
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code
> under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html ). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
> property rights inherent in such information.
>
>
> --
> Martin Kouba
> Senior Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Czech Republic
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code
> under the Apache License, Version 2
> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
> property rights inherent in such information.