+0

Don't really care. Since it's not unified across CDI, having it one way or the other doesn't really make difference to me.

Matej

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine@sabot-durand.net>
> To: "CDI Java EE Specification" <cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 11:29:11 AM
> Subject: [cdi-dev] [Vote] @Priority value order on ordered events
>

> Hi all,
>
> As already explained in a previous mail [1], some of us would like change the
> current order of events to make the highest @Priority value first and the
> lowest last. This change would be an alinement on how @Alternative work
> (highest value being the first candidate).
>
> If you agree to the change (highest to lowest) vote +1, if you disagree -1
> and don't care 0. If you want to discuss thread is always open on [1] but
> time is running out.
>
> Vote will end Monday at 12:00 pm CET.
>
> Thanks for your participation.
>
> Antoine
>
> [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/2016-November/009330.html
>

> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code
> under the Apache License, Version 2
> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
> property rights inherent in such information.
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.