6:40 p.m.
All,
I've attached the CDI 1.1 JSR proposal from Red Hat. I appreciate any comments,
questions or suggestions for amendment you may have. Please send feedback to me or to
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org.
Please let me know if you would like to support the JSR, and if you would like to be on
the EG, or can recommend someone who should.
I don't have access to the 299 EG list, but if someone else does and can forward to
it, that would be much appreciated. Jason or Roberto, could you send this to the jsr-316
list for review, would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Pete
8:42 p.m.
New subject: [weld-dev] CDI 1.1 JSR draft
Sorry, forgot everyone on the list.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:40, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
All,
I've attached the CDI 1.1 JSR proposal from Red Hat. I appreciate any comments,
questions or suggestions for amendment you may have. Please send feedback to me or to
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org.
Looks good Pete.
Please let me know if you would like to support the JSR, and if you
would like to be on the EG, or can recommend someone who should.
I support it.
I don't have access to the 299 EG list, but if someone else does
and can forward to it, that would be much appreciated. Jason or Roberto, could you send
this to the jsr-316 list for review, would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Pete
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
--
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate
PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
5:47 p.m.
I'm thrilled of the news and the prospect of the improvements and new
features.
What I'm most excited about, though, is the renewed commitment to openness,
breaking new ground with this dedicated public list to the discussion of cdi
development.
From the proposal:
"We will leverage the collaborative tools provided by the JBoss Community
infrastructure.
We have a public issue tracker for tracking most issues at
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/
CDI. We have a public EG discussion list at
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
which is free for anyone to join and post to. We will have an EG-private
mailing list, and we
will a public wiki. The reference implementation will be developed entirely
in the public Weld
project in the JBoss Community. The TCK will be developed entirely in the
public CDI TCK
in the JBoss Community. We will leverage the Early Draft feature of JCP 2.6
to allow the
public to see the spec in progress."
"The Specification will be licensed via the ASL 2.0 license.
The RI and TCK will be licensed via the ASL 2.0 license."
These choices will no doubt put CDI on the fast track to becoming *the*
programming model of choice for enterprise Java developers, with or without
the Java EE platform.
Great work Pete!
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
4798
days inactive
4811
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Dan Allen -
Jason Porter -
Pete Muir