Martin Kouba created CDI-282: -------------------------------- Summary: Vetoing types - clarify consequences Key: CDI-282 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-282 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Clarification Reporter: Martin Kouba The spec currently says {{@Vetoed}} type is *prevented from being considered by CDI* and {{ProcessAnnotatedType.veto()}} forces the container to ignore the type. This is quite obvious for classes and interfaces. However not so clear when vetoing annotations (e.g. qualifier). I think ignoring means not being considered as qualifier (thus affects resolution). Other (rather theoretical) example is vetoing non-contextual instances - should it prevent performing dependency injection? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira