[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/DNA-640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Randall Hauch edited comment on DNA-640 at 1/9/10 10:58 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------
Do you think the factory should be logging AND throwing the exceptions? Seems to me that
if it propagates an exception, it should not log it. This is usually a best practice, but
this may need to be different because the engine may have multiple problems and because of
the way it's part of JNDI and initialization. Thoughts?
was (Author: rhauch):
Do you think the factory should be logging AND throwing an exception? Seems to me that
if it propagates the exception, it should not log it. This is usually a best practice,
but this may need to be different because of the way it's part of JNDI and
initialization. Thoughts?
JNDI-Based Deployment
---------------------
Key: DNA-640
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/DNA-640
Project: DNA
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Server
Affects Versions: 0.6
Reporter: Brian Carothers
Assignee: Brian Carothers
Attachments: DNA-640.patch, HOWTO-access-DNA-JNDI.txt
DNA should support a shared deployment model through JNDI, allowing a single DNA Engine
to be shared among multiple deployments in different WARs or JARs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira