Mark Little wrote:
If we were only looking at (i), then JBM would be fine. However,
we're really looking at (ii). Whether we should use the current
Message Store to achieve (i) is a different discussion. My 2 cents is
that we shouldn't: these are really two different entities, even if
they have the same name.
Great, but ESB doesn't need to build (i) because they need (ii). (ii)
seems more to me like a "message warehouse" and a niche use case. I
think the mass-market features and integration are far more important
at this stage of development.
Bill