In which case you should be able to use the HTTP listener. It was developed in the 4.0 beta release but has not been updated with the recent architectural changes for 4.0 GA. That's on the roadmap (one of the community members is looking at it). When would you need to have this capability in place?
Mark.
On 1 Mar 2007, at 14:42, Ashish Rajhansha wrote:This is the protocol stack we are planning to use for this architecture. As per the initial architecture (also attached with this mail just in case others haven't received it) the custom Gateways between the ESBs do communicate over TCP/IP using HTTP/s(Inorder to support JMS).Ashish
On 3/1/07, Mark Little <mlittle@redhat.com> wrote:Can you connect them using HTTP, or FTP? Does it have to be raw TCP/IP?
Mark.
On 1 Mar 2007, at 14:18, Ashish Rajhansha wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ashish Rajhansha < ashish.rajhansha@googlemail.com>
Date: Mar 1, 2007 12:49 PM
Subject: JBossESBs over TCP/IP
To: esb-issues@lists.jboss.org
Hi,
My company has several heterogeneous applications deployed at different sites around the globe and we are aiming at integrating these using ESB. The architecture will involve JBossESBs at each site running on clustered JBoss AS with HA-JBossMQ(moving onto JBoss Messaging when its released). The sites will use custom Gateways for communication between the JBossESBs in order to achieve complete integration. The architecture is aims at supporting any future applications added as services. The new services will be ESB aware and hence will be just plug into the ESBs. Please find the architecture as attachment.
Question - What is the most efficient way to integrate JBossESBs on different sites (only communication available is TCP/IP) so that applications plugged into any of them can provide services to any other application anywhere on the infrastructure preferably without exposing the JNDI globally.Regards,Ashish<Discussion only.jpg>_______________________________________________esb-issues mailing list
<Protocol Stack.jpg><Discussion only.jpg>