Thanks, George!As I am not really keen to change the interface definition, I would do it as you proposed: without the project name.Cheers,IvanOn Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:52 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald@redhat.com> wrote:
Hey Ivan,You could change the configure method signature to pass the project as a parameter, but remember that it may be null.However, I think it would be better to not add the projectName to the DDL file in order to keep it simple and easier to find.Best Regards,George GastaldiHi folks,I am working on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-1443. It's not a big deal, it's a matter of adding a few lines to the JavaEEDefaultProvider class.One of the requirements is that the create and drop scripts should bear the name of the project: <projectName>Creade.ddl and <projectName>Drop.ddl. I wonder is there a way to pass that somehow to the persistence provider?Thanks,Ivan_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev