On second thought, I think this is not a good idea. You should depend on the parser-java addon and that is already in the BOM.

Em 29/03/2014, ās 15:00, George Gastaldi <ggastald@redhat.com> escreveu:

Yes, that would be a good idea. Want to submit a pull-request?

Em 29/03/2014, ās 14:27, Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing@gmail.com> escreveu:

Hi,

I was writing some samples with Roaster and I was wondering if it would make sense to have the Roaster artifacts defined in the Forge BOM ? As a developer it would make my life easier, but then I don't know if you want to tie Forge and Roaster now.

--
Antonio Goncalves 
Software architect and Java Champion

Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Paris JUG | Devoxx France

_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev