On Apr 15, 2011, at 18:55, brian wrote:
>
> hi L3 and john.
>
> I was thinking about the persistence.xml. Would using piping make sense
> to read/parse the fields from the persistence.xml and then pass them to
> GenerateEntities?
>
> so "read-persistence | generate-entities" ?
>
> ...I'm not sure if a plugin can read a file, but if it could, a little
> file-reader/parser might work?
>
>
> On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 12:04 -0400, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
>> Hi John!
>>
>> Thank you for your interest! I think it's fair to say that we are
>> "close" to having a fully-functional database reverse-engineering
>> plugin, but we are not there yet. Brian (ccd) has been doing some work
>> recently (when he has time) to get Max Andersen's prototype up and
>> running. The prototype is here, but has a few shortcomings:
>>
>>
https://github.com/forge/plugin-hibernate-tools
>> 1. Connection settings are hardcoded
>> 2. JDBC drivers are not included with the plugin
>> 3. Does not take persistence.xml into account, if it exists
>> In short, it works, but is not usable yet; however, these are all
>> things that can be worked on if you are interested! And I would be
>> more than happy to help you get together with Brian and get two brains
>> working on this! Would you be intersted in that?
>>
>> No matter your level of commitment, I would recommend joining the dev
>> and users lists:
>> *
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>> *
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
>> Just let me know and I'll get you all the info that you'll need :)
>> ~Lincoln
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:57 PM, John du Clos <
duclosjj@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> Hi Lincoln-
>>
>> I was chatting with Dan Allen and he mentioned you are working
>> on Forge and specifically the reverse engineering feature from
>> the database. I wanted to reach out to you to see if you have
>> any early versions you need testers to help you verify this
>> feature.
>>
>> I look forward to hearing from you!
>> John
>>
>> --- On Wed, 3/16/11, Dan Allen <
dan.j.allen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Dan Allen <
dan.j.allen@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re:
Mojavelinux.com Feedback: seam-gen and
>> cdi/weld
>> To:
duclosjj@yahoo.com
>> Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2011, 9:33 PM
>>
>> Hey John,
>> Thanks for reading the book. I'm glad it helped you
>> along. I know about those painful days of J2EE you are
>> talking about.
>> The best way to get started atm is using the Maven
>> archetype.
>>
http://tinyurl.com/gojavaee
>> That gives you a starter project. We don't yet have
>> the reverse engineering yet for this environment. That
>> what Forge will offer soon. Check out the issue
>> tracker or mailing list for updates.
>> Hope that gets you started. Cheers,
>> - Dan Allen
>> Sent from my Android-powered phone:
>> An open platform for carriers, consumers and
>> developers
>> On Mar 16, 2011 9:04 PM, <
duclosjj@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Submitted by: John duClos <
duclosjj@yahoo.com> on
>> Wednesday, March 16th, 2011 @ 9:04:25 pm (-0400)
>>>
>>> Online Form Fields
>>> ------------------
>>>
>>> Url:
>>>
>>>
>>> Message:
>>> Dan-
>>>
>>> I purchased your Seam book when it was published and
>> am a supporter of
>>> the Seam framework since I lived the challenging
>> days of early J2EE
>>> development.
>>>
>>> I work with database centric solutions and seam-gen
>> allowed me to
>>> develop solutions in record time by getting my
>> project started very
>>> quickly. I'd like to start implementing JEE 6/CDI
>> with JBoss AS 6, but
>>> I can't seem to find a way to issue the seam-gen
>> command.
>>>
>>> I looked at Forge but that is not where seam-gem
>> was. Do you know of a
>>> valid seam-gen solution for JEE 6/CDI based projects
>> (Seam 3).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> John
>>>
>>> Client Variables
>>> ----------------
>>>
>>> HTTP_USER_AGENT:
>>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0;
>> Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR
>> 3.5.21022; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; MDDS; .NET CLR
>> 3.0.30729; MS-RTC LM 8; AskTB5.4)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>>
http://ocpsoft.com
>>
http://scrumshark.com
>> "Keep it Simple"
>
>