On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
One thing I was planning on discussing with Lincoln and the Forge roadmap is around the idea of "Forge as a 4GL" - at the moment it feels mostly like a static code generator - which has the problem of schema changes. But Forge as a 4GL could be more responsive, almost "runtime" code generation. More like what you get in the Rails world. :-)
This is exactly where I hope Forge will *not* go.
Yep. I like Forge a lot for getting up and going. It's quite good at that and there's a clear need for it. IMHO, Forge as a 4GL would be really tough to pull off and would take users' attention off of what Forge is best at.
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev