Is there an issue report? If so, we can shop it around the twitter-sphere. Sounds like a good opportunity for a newcomer to tackle, as ALR likes to emphasize.-DanOn Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 20:23, Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, definitely come to the conclusion that this needs to be supported; however, it will have to wait until after JBW unless someone else wants to take a stab :)On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 13:23, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 18:24, Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter@gmail.com> wrote:As far as classifiers. I've been intentionally avoiding them because it adds a lot of complexity to the dependency API. What do you need?Regardless of whether you like classifiers in general, you can't ignore the fact that they are part of a dependency. You really need to support them or else the forge dep support is just incomplete.I agree that they are bad for distinguishing between two artifacts (like in the case of testng). The main intention for them is to reference complementary jars, like -source, -javadoc, etc. Of course, you don't need to add those as dependencies.-Dan--Dan AllenPrincipal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
--Dan AllenPrincipal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction