Hey Paul,

We already have plugin search capabilities in the forge plugin. Basically I don't think we really need the XML repo because it's so close in functionality to what's already there. I do want to keep the idea of plugin-groups, but maybe tags is the answer there. Just let people provide tags that are searchable along with name and description.

Try this out in Forge and you will see what I mean: (You may want to update and build a new snapshot.)

$ forge find-plugin *
$ forge find-plugin seam

:)

Thoughts?
~Lincoln


On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Paul Bakker <paul.bakker.nl@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Lincoln,

Yes that would be a good improvement. 
I think it's also good if we put the plugin browsing functionallity in the forge plugin because now it feels a bit out of place (not sure if you wanted to do that too). I will rewrite the code in the plugin-repo to use this. 

What library do we use for yaml parsing?

Paul



On Jul 18, 2011, at 10:11 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:

Hey Paul,

It seems like we have two orthogonal plugin repositories. I'd like to start using GitHub (have already started) to host the repository for easy adds/updates/etc.

Do you think your plugin groups can be incorporated into what we've got going on here?
https://raw.github.com/forge/plugin-repository/master/repository.yaml

This is where the code lives for the search and installation (you've probably already seen it.)
https://github.com/forge/core/blob/master/shell/src/main/java/org/jboss/forge/shell/plugins/builtin/ForgePlugin.java

--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"




--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"