I think it was 50% faster, but I think you're right ;) this deserves a T-Shirt!


On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:07 AM, <ggastald@redhat.com> wrote:
Damn right ! :) Let's get one for Thomas ! :)


On 11/06/2012 12:09 PM, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote:
Guys, remember what was the promise? Whoever makes Forge start faster, gets a Forge T-shirt.... :-)

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:42 PM, <ggastald@redhat.com> wrote:
Tested and merged. It decreased the startup time for about 2 seconds in my tests.

Thanks !


On 11/06/2012 04:38 AM, Thomas Frühbeck wrote:
Thanks for your support, please have a look at the change for https://github.com/shadogray/core/commit/0365b50e46e6ceb9863de2aab27dae1387db51bf
I cannot find anything wrong about it, it's not elegant - just time saving :-)

Regards,
Thomas

Am 05.11.2012 19:20, schrieb ggastald@redhat.com:
In this case, I want to apologize for my previously incorrect statement.

Thomas, we can work together to have this all set up in 1.1.2.Final which is due next week, what do you think ?

Best Regards,

George Gastaldi

On 11/05/2012 02:42 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
Yes, just for clarification, we are still making major updates and improvements to 1.x in parallel to 2.0 research.



--
George Gastaldi | Senior Software Engineer
JBoss Forge Team
Red Hat

_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev




_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

--
George Gastaldi | Senior Software Engineer
JBoss Forge Team
Red Hat

_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev




--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."