Hi all,

I'm a bit particular on wording because I think that the right word makes things easier for the new comer. I'm implementing a new UI command to add an injection point to a class. So, the name of the command would be cdi-add-injection-point. But then I started to have a look at the other xxx-add-yyy commands :

addon-add-dependency

project-add-dependencies

project-add-managed-dependencies

project-add-repository

java-add-annotation

constraint-add

They all add something, into something already existing. If we take this definition for granted, shouldn't the following commands be renamed add instead of new :

jpa-new-named-query

cdi-new-conversation

java-new-enum-const

java-new-field

java-new-method

jpa-new-field

Antonio Goncalves
Software architect and Java Champion

Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Paris JUG | Devoxx France