I am leaning towards the java-add-annotation approach as it seems more intuitive and could solve other use cases that may arise.

Em 13/06/2014, às 04:19, Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing@gmail.com> escreveu:

When I create an EJB with Forge with the following command : 

ejb-new-bean --named MyService

I get the following : 

@Stateless

@LocalBean

public class MyService implements Serializable

In some cases, I would need to add an extra @Named annotation. Several ways to do it. On the EJB command itself, we could add a parameter : 

ejb-new-bean --named MyService --addNamed

But I think it would be good to have something more generic that could be used anywhere. We could use the same logic as constraint-add (that adds any kind of constraint on any Entity) and have something like

cdi-add-qualifier --qualifier Named --target org.app.service.MyService

// or on a property, which could be useful

cdi-add-qualifier --qualifier Named --onProperty myProp

cdi-add-qualifier --qualifier Named --onMethod myMethod

Or something even more generic would be to use the Java command

java-add-annotation --annotation javax.inject.Named --target org.app.service.MyService

java-add-annotation --annotation javax.inject.Named --target org.app.service.MyService --onProperty myProp

java-add-annotation --annotation javax.inject.Named --target org.app.service.MyService --onMethod myMethod

java-add-annotation --annotation javax.inject.Named --onProperty myProp

java-add-annotation --annotation javax.inject.Named --onMethod myMethod

Any thoughts ?

Antonio

_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev