On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Keith Babo <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:kbabo@redhat.com" target="_blank">kbabo@redhat.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><br></div>Thinking about this more, it&#39;s possible that the template used in our Eclipse tooling and the one used in Forge have parted.  My hope is that the Forge one still plays nicely with the new BPMN 2 editor at Eclipse, but I have seen issues in the past.   In any case, if you hit an issue, just yell and I&#39;m sure there&#39;s a workaround or I can push a fix pronto.</div>

</blockquote><div><br>I&#39;m sort of sensing that. The test now runs, but Eclipse thinks 50% of the lines in switchyard.xml are invalid. Since I usually don&#39;t trust Eclipse, I just ignore that fool.<br><br>...now if Eclipse would not run out of memory installing the BPM2 editor, I might be able to see where we stand on that front.<br>

<br>-Dan <br clear="all"></div></div><br>-- <br><div>Dan Allen</div>Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><div><a href="http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen" target="_blank">http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>

<a href="http://mojavelinux.com" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br></div><br>