[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMFORGE-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu...
]
Dan Allen commented on SEAMFORGE-172:
-------------------------------------
{quote}
I think we should probably provide minimal in-project refactoring support
{quote}
Agreed, the scope is in-project. I'm not suggesting that we match the functionality
and scope an IDE provides. But refactoring is essential to being able to intelligently
manipulate the project.
{quote}
I don't think this should be a priority for us since we are encouraging use of Forge +
IDE of choice.
{quote}
I think it should be a medium priority. The priority is for the plugins, not necessarily
for providing top-level refactoring commands. Plugins will often need to effectively do a
refactoring, and without that control, the plugin will have to hack and slash...which is
what we want to be able to avoid.
To make my position clear, I do still see this as a complement to and IDE.
Add refactoring capability to code manipulator
----------------------------------------------
Key: SEAMFORGE-172
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMFORGE-172
Project: Seam Forge
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Parsers / File Manipulation
Affects Versions: 1.0.0.Alpha3
Reporter: Dan Allen
Although challenging, the ability to refactor within a project would be immensely
powerful for plugin writers. Basic refactoring include renaming types, fields and methods.
Matching updates to resource files (XML, Java properties, etc) would also be useful. We
could see how far that could take us before deciding if more complex refactoring is
necessary.
I would suggest researching whether it's possible to extra the refactoring logic out
of the Eclipse tooling into a reusable library (if it isn't already). Another option
is RefactorIT, which used to be a proprietary plugin for the major Java IDEs but is now
CDDL and GPL:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/refactorit/
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira