July 2015 - forge-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (ROASTER-76) Which one encloses a local class.

by Shoji Kuzukami (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Shoji Kuzukami edited comment on ROASTER-76 at 7/10/15 3:12 AM: ---------------------------------------------------------------- Really? It is too heavy to support fully the specification. But I yet want to whether 'A local class must not be contained in the JavaType#getNestedClasses()' of indirectly enclosing "Type" or not, because I can avoid the bug of "The getQualifiedName() for local class" in my application if local classes are removed from 'JavaType#getNestedClasses()'. Now it is true that A local class is contained in the JavaType#getNestedClasses() of indirectly enclosing "Type". was (Author: kuzukami): Really? It is too heavy to support fully the specification. But I yet want to whether 'A local class must not be contained in the JavaType#getNestedClasses()' or not, because I can avoid the bug of "The getQualifiedName() for local class" in my application if local classes are removed from 'JavaType#getNestedClasses()'. Now it is true that 'A local class is contained in the JavaType#getNestedClasses()'. > Which one encloses a local class. > --------------------------------- > > Key: ROASTER-76 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76 > Project: Roaster > Issue Type: Quality Risk > Components: API, JDT > Affects Versions: 2.14.0.Final > Reporter: Shoji Kuzukami > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ROASTER-76) Which one encloses a local class.

by Shoji Kuzukami (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Shoji Kuzukami edited comment on ROASTER-76 at 7/10/15 3:10 AM: ---------------------------------------------------------------- Really? It is too heavy to support fully the specification. But I yet want to whether 'A local class must not be contained in the JavaType#getNestedClasses()' or not, because I can avoid the bug of "The getQualifiedName() for local class" in my application if local classes are removed from 'JavaType#getNestedClasses()'. Now it is true that 'A local class is contained in the JavaType#getNestedClasses()'. was (Author: kuzukami): Really? It is too heavy to support fully the specification. But I yet want to whether 'A local class must not be contained in the JavaType#getNestedClasses()' or not, because I can avoid the bug of "The getQualifiedName() for local class" in my application if local classes are removed from 'JavaType#getNestedClasses()'. > Which one encloses a local class. > --------------------------------- > > Key: ROASTER-76 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76 > Project: Roaster > Issue Type: Quality Risk > Components: API, JDT > Affects Versions: 2.14.0.Final > Reporter: Shoji Kuzukami > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ROASTER-76) Which one encloses a local class.

by Shoji Kuzukami (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Shoji Kuzukami commented on ROASTER-76: --------------------------------------- Really? It is too heavy to support fully the specification. But I yet want to whether 'A local class must not be contained in the JavaType#getNestedClasses()' or not, because I can avoid the bug of "The getQualifiedName() for local class" in my application if local classes are removed from 'JavaType#getNestedClasses()'. > Which one encloses a local class. > --------------------------------- > > Key: ROASTER-76 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76 > Project: Roaster > Issue Type: Quality Risk > Components: API, JDT > Affects Versions: 2.14.0.Final > Reporter: Shoji Kuzukami > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ROASTER-76) Which one encloses a local class.

by George Gastaldi (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] George Gastaldi commented on ROASTER-76: ---------------------------------------- Also, as Local classes belong to a statement block (http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se8/html/jls-14.html#jls-Block), I believe Roaster should have a Block concept model, but that´s part of ROASTER-1 IMHO > Which one encloses a local class. > --------------------------------- > > Key: ROASTER-76 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76 > Project: Roaster > Issue Type: Quality Risk > Components: API, JDT > Affects Versions: 2.14.0.Final > Reporter: Shoji Kuzukami > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ROASTER-76) Which one encloses a local class.

by George Gastaldi (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] George Gastaldi commented on ROASTER-76: ---------------------------------------- A local class is not accessible outside the method, so IMHO one possible solution is for the Method interface to extend TypeHolder. This should return the local classes that belong to a method. > Which one encloses a local class. > --------------------------------- > > Key: ROASTER-76 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76 > Project: Roaster > Issue Type: Quality Risk > Components: API, JDT > Affects Versions: 2.14.0.Final > Reporter: Shoji Kuzukami > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ROASTER-76) Which one encloses a local class.

by Shoji Kuzukami (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Shoji Kuzukami commented on ROASTER-76: --------------------------------------- Which do you mean 'A local class must not be contained in the JavaType#getNestedClasses()' or 'There is no design for the specification now'? If it's latter, I'll send a experimental pull request for the local class. > Which one encloses a local class. > --------------------------------- > > Key: ROASTER-76 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76 > Project: Roaster > Issue Type: Quality Risk > Components: API, JDT > Affects Versions: 2.14.0.Final > Reporter: Shoji Kuzukami > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ROASTER-76) Which one encloses a local class.

by George Gastaldi (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] George Gastaldi commented on ROASTER-76: ---------------------------------------- If I understood correctly, I´m afraid there is no model representation for a local class. That involves parsing the method body, and that is not performed by Roaster at the moment. I think this belongs to ROASTER-1 ? > Which one encloses a local class. > --------------------------------- > > Key: ROASTER-76 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76 > Project: Roaster > Issue Type: Quality Risk > Components: API, JDT > Affects Versions: 2.14.0.Final > Reporter: Shoji Kuzukami > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ROASTER-76) Which one encloses a local class.

by Shoji Kuzukami (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Shoji Kuzukami edited comment on ROASTER-76 at 7/10/15 1:26 AM: ---------------------------------------------------------------- I want to know the project design for enclosure of a local class (JSL 14.3. Local Class Declarations). Now a local class is enclosed by the 'Type' element indirectly enclosing instead of the method body directly enclosing. That is a good design but it's not clarified. Please declare the specification. The getQualifiedName() for local class seems broken regardless of the specification. A local class must be named such as 'OuterClass$1LocalClass' or 'OuterClass$2LocalClass', though now it's named as 'OuterClass$LocalClass'. I've had some experimental code and refactors for that bug. But I cannot make a pull request if the project design for a local class is not fixed, was (Author: kuzukami): I want to know the project design for enclosure of a local class (JSL 14.3. Local Class Declarations). Now a local class is enclosed by the 'Type' element indirectly enclosing instead of the method body directly enclosing. That is a good design but it's not clarified. Please declare the specification. The getQualifiedName() for local class seems broken regardless of the specification. They must be named such as 'OuterClass$1LocalClass' or 'OuterClass$2LocalClass', though now they are named as 'OuterClass$LocalClass'. I've had some experimental code and refactors for that bug. But I cannot make a pull request if the project design for a local class is not fixed, > Which one encloses a local class. > --------------------------------- > > Key: ROASTER-76 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76 > Project: Roaster > Issue Type: Quality Risk > Components: API, JDT > Affects Versions: 2.14.0.Final > Reporter: Shoji Kuzukami > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ROASTER-76) Which one encloses a local class.

by Shoji Kuzukami (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Shoji Kuzukami edited comment on ROASTER-76 at 7/10/15 1:26 AM: ---------------------------------------------------------------- I want to know the project design for enclosure of a local class (JSL 14.3. Local Class Declarations). Now a local class is enclosed by the 'Type' element indirectly enclosing instead of the method body directly enclosing. That is a good design but it's not clarified. Please declare the specification. The getQualifiedName() for local class seems broken regardless of the specification. They must be named such as 'OuterClass$1LocalClass' or 'OuterClass$2LocalClass', though now they are named as 'OuterClass$LocalClass'. I've had some experimental code and refactors for that bug. But I cannot make a pull request if the project design for a local class is not fixed, was (Author: kuzukami): I want to know the project design for enclosure of a local class (JSL 14.3. Local Class Declarations). Now a local class is enclosed by the 'Type' element indirectly enclosing instead of the method body directly enclosing. That is a good design but it's not clarified. Please declare the specification. The getQualifiedName() for local class seems broken. They must be named such as 'OuterClass$1LocalClass' or 'OuterClass$2LocalClass', though now they are named as 'OuterClass$LocalClass'. I've had some experimental code and refactors for that bug. But I cannot make a pull request if the project design for a local class is not fixed, > Which one encloses a local class. > --------------------------------- > > Key: ROASTER-76 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76 > Project: Roaster > Issue Type: Quality Risk > Components: API, JDT > Affects Versions: 2.14.0.Final > Reporter: Shoji Kuzukami > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ROASTER-76) Which one encloses a local class.

by Shoji Kuzukami (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Shoji Kuzukami edited comment on ROASTER-76 at 7/10/15 1:25 AM: ---------------------------------------------------------------- I want to know the project design for enclosure of a local class (JSL 14.3. Local Class Declarations). Now a local class is enclosed by the 'Type' element indirectly enclosing instead of the method body directly enclosing. That is a good design but it's not clarified. Please declare the specification. The getQualifiedName() for local class seems broken. They must be named such as 'OuterClass$1LocalClass' or 'OuterClass$2LocalClass', though now they are named as 'OuterClass$LocalClass'. I've had some experimental code and refactors for that bug. But I cannot make a pull request if the project design for a local class is not fixed, was (Author: kuzukami): I want to know the project design for enclosure of a local class (JSL 14.3. Local Class Declarations). Now a local class is enclosed by a 'Type' element indirectly enclosing instead of a method body directly enclosing. That is a good design but it's not clarified. Please declare the specification. The getQualifiedName() for local class seems broken. They must be named such as 'OuterClass$1LocalClass' or 'OuterClass$2LocalClass', though now they are named as 'OuterClass$LocalClass'. I've had some experimental code and refactors for that bug. But I cannot make a pull request if the project design for a local class is not fixed, > Which one encloses a local class. > --------------------------------- > > Key: ROASTER-76 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76 > Project: Roaster > Issue Type: Quality Risk > Components: API, JDT > Affects Versions: 2.14.0.Final > Reporter: Shoji Kuzukami > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

forge-issues July 2015