May 2017 - forge-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (FORGE-2746) project-new duplicates child module name when re-creating a module after having deleted it

by Chris Laprun (JIRA)

Chris Laprun created FORGE-2746: ----------------------------------- Summary: project-new duplicates child module name when re-creating a module after having deleted it Key: FORGE-2746 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2746 Project: Forge Issue Type: Bug Components: Projects Affects Versions: 3.6.1.Final Reporter: Chris Laprun This leads to errors such as: ***ERROR*** 2 problems were encountered while building the effective model for org.cdstore:project:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [ERROR] 'modules.module[1]' specifies duplicate child module cdservice @ line 11, column 13 [ERROR] 'modules.module[2]' specifies duplicate child module cdservice @ line 12, column 13 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ROASTER-126) Format options not taken into account

by Luca Burgazzoli (JIRA)

Luca Burgazzoli created ROASTER-126: --------------------------------------- Summary: Format options not taken into account Key: ROASTER-126 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-126 Project: Roaster Issue Type: Bug Components: Formatter Affects Versions: 2.20.0.Final Reporter: Luca Burgazzoli Priority: Minor I'm doing some small experiments with Forge Roaster and I'm unable to get some formatting options taken into account. My code and the result is here: https://gist.github.com/lburgazzoli/115377c3887972696f77db3a71fef85f As you can notice, I configured some properties so that the code should wrap at column 120 and it should use spaces instead of tabs but my set-up is ignored and the resulting code is still formatted with some defaults. I set the formatting properties with: {code:java} properties.put(DefaultCodeFormatterConstants.FORMATTER_LINE_SPLIT, "120") properties.put(DefaultCodeFormatterConstants.FORMATTER_TAB_CHAR, "space") properties.put(DefaultCodeFormatterConstants.FORMATTER_TAB_SIZE, "4") {code} The behaviour does not change if I use constants without the shaded package value. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (FORGE-2737) JSF Scaffold throws java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: forgeview:display(_itemProfile)

by George Gastaldi (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] George Gastaldi commented on FORGE-2737: ---------------------------------------- Even with the workaround described above? > JSF Scaffold throws java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: forgeview:display(_itemProfile) > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FORGE-2737 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2737 > Project: Forge > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Scaffold > Affects Versions: 3.6.0.Final > Reporter: George Gastaldi > Labels: eap7.1-rfe-failure > Fix For: 3.x Future > > > After the application is deployed, some of the entities return "Oops, That's going to leave a mark!" instead the form as stated in readme. > An error is logged: ERROR [io.undertow.request] (default task-26) UT005023: Exception handling request to /forge-example/faces/productOrder/search.xhtml: javax.servlet.ServletException: forgeview:display(_itemCustomer) > Full stack trace: > {code} > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: forgeview:display(_itemProfile) > at javax.faces.component.UIComponentBase.validateId(UIComponentBase.java:593) > at javax.faces.component.UIComponentBase.setId(UIComponentBase.java:413) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentTagHandlerDelegateImpl.assignUniqueId(ComponentTagHandlerDelegateImpl.java:442) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentTagHandlerDelegateImpl.apply(ComponentTagHandlerDelegateImpl.java:179) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.DelegatingMetaTagHandler.apply(DelegatingMetaTagHandler.java:120) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:95) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.DelegatingMetaTagHandler.applyNextHandler(DelegatingMetaTagHandler.java:137) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentTagHandlerDelegateImpl.apply(ComponentTagHandlerDelegateImpl.java:202) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.DelegatingMetaTagHandler.apply(DelegatingMetaTagHandler.java:120) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:95) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.DelegatingMetaTagHandler.applyNextHandler(DelegatingMetaTagHandler.java:137) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentTagHandlerDelegateImpl.apply(ComponentTagHandlerDelegateImpl.java:202) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.DelegatingMetaTagHandler.apply(DelegatingMetaTagHandler.java:120) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:95) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.DelegatingMetaTagHandler.applyNextHandler(DelegatingMetaTagHandler.java:137) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentTagHandlerDelegateImpl.apply(ComponentTagHandlerDelegateImpl.java:202) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.DelegatingMetaTagHandler.apply(DelegatingMetaTagHandler.java:120) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:95) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.DelegatingMetaTagHandler.applyNextHandler(DelegatingMetaTagHandler.java:137) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentTagHandlerDelegateImpl.apply(ComponentTagHandlerDelegateImpl.java:202) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.DelegatingMetaTagHandler.apply(DelegatingMetaTagHandler.java:120) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.tag.ui.DefineHandler.applyDefinition(DefineHandler.java:106) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.tag.ui.CompositionHandler.apply(CompositionHandler.java:206) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.impl.DefaultFaceletContext$TemplateManager.apply(DefaultFaceletContext.java:395) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.impl.DefaultFaceletContext.includeDefinition(DefaultFaceletContext.java:366) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.tag.ui.InsertHandler.apply(InsertHandler.java:111) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:95) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.DelegatingMetaTagHandler.applyNextHandler(DelegatingMetaTagHandler.java:137) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentTagHandlerDelegateImpl.apply(ComponentTagHandlerDelegateImpl.java:202) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.DelegatingMetaTagHandler.apply(DelegatingMetaTagHandler.java:120) > at javax.faces.view.facelets.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:95) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.compiler.NamespaceHandler.apply(NamespaceHandler.java:93) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.compiler.EncodingHandler.apply(EncodingHandler.java:87) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.impl.DefaultFacelet.include(DefaultFacelet.java:312) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.impl.DefaultFacelet.include(DefaultFacelet.java:371) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.impl.DefaultFacelet.include(DefaultFacelet.java:350) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.impl.DefaultFaceletContext.includeFacelet(DefaultFaceletContext.java:199) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.tag.ui.CompositionHandler.apply(CompositionHandler.java:174) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.compiler.NamespaceHandler.apply(NamespaceHandler.java:93) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.compiler.EncodingHandler.apply(EncodingHandler.java:87) > at com.sun.faces.facelets.impl.DefaultFacelet.apply(DefaultFacelet.java:161) > at com.sun.faces.application.view.FaceletViewHandlingStrategy.buildView(FaceletViewHandlingStrategy.java:1006) > at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.RenderResponsePhase.execute(RenderResponsePhase.java:99) > at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.Phase.doPhase(Phase.java:101) > at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java:219) > at javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:659) > ... 40 more > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (FORGE-2745) Make it possible for AbstractJavaSourceCommand to externalize the code decoration

by George Gastaldi (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] George Gastaldi closed FORGE-2745. ---------------------------------- Resolution: Done > Make it possible for AbstractJavaSourceCommand to externalize the code decoration > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FORGE-2745 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2745 > Project: Forge > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Addon Development > Affects Versions: 3.6.1.Final > Reporter: Chris Laprun > Assignee: Chris Laprun > Fix For: 3.6.2.Final > > > This would help make the class more reusable in particular to be able to replace the code decoration logic of its sub-classes. For example, this would allow reusing the Java EE addons logic and customize the generated code to issue Spring version of the code (where it makes sense). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (FORGE-2745) Make it possible for AbstractJavaSourceCommand to externalize the code decoration

by Anonymous (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Issue was automatically transitioned when Chris Laprun created pull request #611 in GitHub ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Status: Pull Request Sent (was: Open) > Make it possible for AbstractJavaSourceCommand to externalize the code decoration > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FORGE-2745 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2745 > Project: Forge > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Addon Development > Affects Versions: 3.6.1.Final > Reporter: Chris Laprun > Assignee: Chris Laprun > Fix For: 3.6.2.Final > > > This would help make the class more reusable in particular to be able to replace the code decoration logic of its sub-classes. For example, this would allow reusing the Java EE addons logic and customize the generated code to issue Spring version of the code (where it makes sense). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (FORGE-2744) Extract interfaces for JEE addon commands that will be overriden by Spring Boot versions

by Chris Laprun (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Chris Laprun commented on FORGE-2744: ------------------------------------- Started work in https://github.com/metacosm/core/tree/FORGE-2744 branch. > Extract interfaces for JEE addon commands that will be overriden by Spring Boot versions > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FORGE-2744 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2744 > Project: Forge > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Addon Development > Affects Versions: 3.6.1.Final > Reporter: Chris Laprun > Assignee: Chris Laprun > Fix For: 3.6.2.Final > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (FORGE-2745) Make it possible for AbstractJavaSourceCommand to externalize the code decoration

by Chris Laprun (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Chris Laprun commented on FORGE-2745: ------------------------------------- PR: https://github.com/forge/core/pull/611 > Make it possible for AbstractJavaSourceCommand to externalize the code decoration > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FORGE-2745 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2745 > Project: Forge > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Addon Development > Affects Versions: 3.6.1.Final > Reporter: Chris Laprun > Assignee: Chris Laprun > Fix For: 3.6.2.Final > > > This would help make the class more reusable in particular to be able to replace the code decoration logic of its sub-classes. For example, this would allow reusing the Java EE addons logic and customize the generated code to issue Spring version of the code (where it makes sense). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (FORGE-2745) Make it possible for AbstractJavaSourceCommand to externalize the code decoration

by Chris Laprun (JIRA)

Chris Laprun created FORGE-2745: ----------------------------------- Summary: Make it possible for AbstractJavaSourceCommand to externalize the code decoration Key: FORGE-2745 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2745 Project: Forge Issue Type: Enhancement Components: Addon Development Affects Versions: 3.6.1.Final Reporter: Chris Laprun Assignee: Chris Laprun Fix For: 3.6.2.Final This would help make the class more reusable in particular to be able to replace the code decoration logic of its sub-classes. For example, this would allow reusing the Java EE addons logic and customize the generated code to issue Spring version of the code (where it makes sense). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (FORGE-2744) Extract interfaces for JEE addon commands that will be overriden by Spring Boot versions

by Chris Laprun (JIRA)

Chris Laprun created FORGE-2744: ----------------------------------- Summary: Extract interfaces for JEE addon commands that will be overriden by Spring Boot versions Key: FORGE-2744 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2744 Project: Forge Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Addon Development Affects Versions: 3.6.1.Final Reporter: Chris Laprun Assignee: Chris Laprun Fix For: 3.6.2.Final -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (FORGE-2742) Upgrade to Furnace 2.26.0.Final

by George Gastaldi (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] George Gastaldi closed FORGE-2742. ---------------------------------- > Upgrade to Furnace 2.26.0.Final > ------------------------------- > > Key: FORGE-2742 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2742 > Project: Forge > Issue Type: Component Upgrade > Components: Furnace (Container) > Affects Versions: 3.6.1.Final > Reporter: George Gastaldi > Assignee: George Gastaldi > Fix For: 3.6.2.Final > > > furnace-cdi uses Weld 3.0.0.Final, which is based on CDI 2.0 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

forge-issues May 2017