Furnace container should support pluggable service providers. ------------------------------------------------------------- Key: FORGE-1007 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-1007 Project: Forge Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Furnace (Container) Affects Versions: 2.0.0.Alpha6 Reporter: Lincoln Baxter III Assignee: Lincoln Baxter III Fix For: 2.0.0.Alpha7 {code}11:49:28 AM lincolnthree1: gastaldi: I am considering creating a furnace-cdi addon 11:50:22 AM lincolnthree1: if all addons depended on this, it would make it a lot easier to support pluggable addon containers, instead of assuming CDI based on beans.xml 11:50:32 AM lincolnthree1: they could depend on that instead of furnace-api 11:50:43 AM lincolnthree1: and it would no longer need to be <provided> scope 11:51:21 AM lincolnthree1: i would say that it could wait for Forge 2.1 11:51:23 AM lincolnthree1: but... 11:51:29 AM lincolnthree1: it would likely not be a backwards compatible change. 11:52:16 AM lincolnthree1: it's pretty complicated though 11:52:22 AM lincolnthree1: so i'll probably put it off 11:52:40 AM lincolnthree1: we need to get business value first 11:52:42 AM lincolnthree1: and we don't need that atm 11:53:08 AM lincolnthree1: but… what we could do is use the addon as a marker 11:53:18 AM lincolnthree1: that would be simpler than actually implementing it all 11:53:23 AM lincolnthree1: it would still bring in the APIs 11:53:29 AM lincolnthree1: but wouldn't really change the internals 11:55:24 AM gastaldi: hummm 11:55:31 AM gastaldi: that would be interesting 11:55:32 AM lincolnthree1: actually, that might very well work 11:55:57 AM gastaldi: I think we should do it for 2.0 11:56:00 AM lincolnthree1: in the end, this addon would register a service called "AddonInitializer" that handles the startup/shutdown of the addon (aka, addon Runnable) 11:56:02 AM lincolnthree1: yeah me too 11:56:15 AM lincolnthree1: Furnace could get that instance from the addon itself using ServiceLoader 11:56:32 AM lincolnthree1: then it would call it and the lifecycle comes from the addon itself!! 11:56:41 AM lincolnthree1: brilliant! 11:57:07 AM lincolnthree1: a classloading-only addon just becomes one, then, that doesnt have an AddonInitializer 11:57:10 AM lincolnthree1: I like it 11:57:11 AM lincolnthree1: a lot 11:57:58 AM gastaldi: JIRA that sh*t 11:58:18 AM lincolnthree1: it maybe already 11:58:23 AM lincolnthree1: but i'll add these notes if it is gegastaldi [~gastaldi@redhat/jboss/gastaldi] entered the room. (11:58:33 AM) mode (+o gegastaldi) by ChanServ (11:58:33 AM) 12:00:04 PM lincolnthree1: gastaldi: getting lunch and relocating 12:00:06 PM lincolnthree1: back in a bit 12:00:35 PM gegastaldi: K 12:02:17 PM gegastaldi: That would enable CDI extensions 12:02:26 PM gegastaldi: On each addon 12:02:43 PM lincolnthree1: gegastaldi: maybe 12:02:46 PM lincolnthree1: gegastaldi: hopefully{code}