[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Matej Briskar updated FORGE-2144: --------------------------------- Description: Powermock is a framework for mocking static methods (this is a tricky thing to do). By default you will run it using @RunWith annotation, however since the arquillian has it's own @RunWith(Arquillian.class) annotation, it provides an option to use the mocking using the junit.Rule. This, however, makes the tests fail. The difference is in the registry.getExportedInstance() for the _DEFAULT_ addon. In one it returns the class, in the other it does not. Recently, there was added another way of running the powermock along arquillian using java agent, even though it is not easy to make this work, it looks it fails on same error. Error: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Test runner could not locate test class [org.jboss.windup.rules.java.NotUnzippableFileTest] in any deployed Addon. was: Powermock is a framework for mocking static methods (this is a tricky thing to do). By default you will run it using @RunWith annotation, however since the arquillian has it's own @RunWith(Arquillian.class) annotation, it provides an option to use the mocking using the junit.Rule. This, however, makes the tests fail. The difference is in the registry.getExportedInstance() for the _DEFAULT_ addon. In one it returns the class, in the other it does not. Recently, there was added another way of running the powermock along arquillian using java agent, so users of this framework will still have hope within forge testing. Haven't tried it yet. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.8#6338)