[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-1031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Lincoln Baxter III commented on FORGE-1031:
-------------------------------------------
I agree with this. I think that using the coordinates detected in the POM file, would
probably be a more suitable alternative when installation occurs from a Git repository.
This would keep the naming better in line with maven installation if/when that becomes
viable again for Forge 1.
Synchronize repository.yaml model with Forge's plugin
installation model
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: FORGE-1031
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-1031
Project: Forge
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: Documentation
Affects Versions: 1.3.3.Final
Reporter: Lennart Jörelid
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.x Future
The repository.yaml file holds a Maven GAV to each Forge Plugin.
However, Forge's resolution only retrieves the latest/HEAD revision of a particular
Git Branch, ignoring the Maven GAV given in the repository.yaml.
Thus, one *must* release SNAPSHOT plugin versions in order to be able to bugfix Forge
plugins. This is quite contrary to a normal Maven release, where SNAPSHOT versions are not
permitted (for example by the release plugin).
So ...
# Forge only uses HEAD of a branch to find a plugin source code revision
# Repository.yaml indicates that a particular Maven GAV for a project should be used for
the plugin
# During resolution, Forge ignores the Maven GAV in repository.yaml
# Maven releases are normally not permitted to contain SNAPSHOTs, but the two facts above
*requires* Forge plugins to be Maven SNAPSHOTs.
It seems that two different (and not particularly coherent) models are used to define
Forge's resolution here.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira