[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Matej Briskar updated FORGE-2144:
---------------------------------
Description:
Powermock is a framework for mocking static methods (this is a tricky thing to do). By
default you will run it using @RunWith annotation, however since the arquillian has
it's own @RunWith(Arquillian.class) annotation, it provides an option to use the
mocking using the junit.Rule. This, however, makes the tests fail.
Recently, there was added another way of running the powermock along arquillian using java
agent, so users of this framework will still have hope within forge testing. Haven't
tried it yet.
was:Powermock is a framework for mocking static methods (this is a tricky thing to do).
By default you will run it using @RunWith annotation, however since the arquillian has
it's own @RunWith(Arquillian.class) annotation, it provides an option to use the
mocking using the junit.Rule. This, however, makes the tests fail.
Adding powermock rule into the test will cause forge to be unable to
find it
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: FORGE-2144
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2144
Project: Forge
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Matej Briskar
Powermock is a framework for mocking static methods (this is a tricky thing to do). By
default you will run it using @RunWith annotation, however since the arquillian has
it's own @RunWith(Arquillian.class) annotation, it provides an option to use the
mocking using the junit.Rule. This, however, makes the tests fail.
Recently, there was added another way of running the powermock along arquillian using
java agent, so users of this framework will still have hope within forge testing.
Haven't tried it yet.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.8#6338)