[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Shoji Kuzukami edited comment on ROASTER-76 at 7/10/15 3:20 AM: ---------------------------------------------------------------- Really? It is too heavy to support fully the specification. But I yet want to know which design guideline is preferable, 'A local class must be contained in the #getNestedClasses() of the directly enclosing method' or 'contained in the one of indirectly enclosing "Type"'? Is it preferable that "directly enclosing method" design? It's happy for me that a local class is removed from #getNestedClasses() of 'indirectly enclosing "Type"' because I can avoid the bug of "The getQualifiedName() for local class" in my application. was (Author: kuzukami): Really? It is too heavy to support fully the specification. But I yet want to know which design guideline is preferable, 'A local class must be contained in the #getNestedClasses() of the directly enclosing method' or 'contained in the one of indirectly enclosing "Type"'? Is it preferable that "directly enclosing method" design? That's happy for me that a local class is removed from #getNestedClasses() of 'indirectly enclosing "Type"' because I can avoid the bug of "The getQualifiedName() for local class" in my application. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)