[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ROASTER-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Shoji Kuzukami edited comment on ROASTER-76 at 7/10/15 3:12 AM: ---------------------------------------------------------------- Really? It is too heavy to support fully the specification. But I yet want to whether 'A local class must not be contained in the JavaType#getNestedClasses()' of indirectly enclosing "Type" or not, because I can avoid the bug of "The getQualifiedName() for local class" in my application if local classes are removed from 'JavaType#getNestedClasses()'. Now it is true that A local class is contained in the JavaType#getNestedClasses() of indirectly enclosing "Type". was (Author: kuzukami): Really? It is too heavy to support fully the specification. But I yet want to whether 'A local class must not be contained in the JavaType#getNestedClasses()' or not, because I can avoid the bug of "The getQualifiedName() for local class" in my application if local classes are removed from 'JavaType#getNestedClasses()'. Now it is true that 'A local class is contained in the JavaType#getNestedClasses()'. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)