Make sense remove it from the pom if we go to Java 8. :)Can you share your problem with Java 9? (even though we don't have a final version of Java 9 ATM)On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov@gmail.com> wrote:Hi Geroge,That's wonderful! Finally we can rewrite all those anonymous inner classes with lambdas. And use streams. And sometimes Optional in the APIs :)Do you plan to remove this from the root pom:<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<argLine>-Xms256m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m</argLine>
</configuration>
</plugin>It doesn't make sense anymore. But has been bugging me all the time when I try to build Forge with Java 9 (it's an error there).Cheers,IvanOn Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro@gmail.com> wrote:I agree with that! :)+1 for Java 8.On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:23 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald@redhat.com> wrote:_______________________________________________Hello Forge users,
For the next minor release, I'd like to make JDK8 the minimum requirement.
The JBoss Tools team is already using JDK8 as the minimum requirement for their new versions. We are already running our build in JDK8 (with sources set to 1.7 still)
Is there any objection? Say it now or forever hold your peace, because the Forge train never stops ;)
Best Regards, love you all!
George Gastaldi
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev--
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev--
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev