On Friday 10 January 2014 at 16:00, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA512All,We've seen a request to add the possibility for administrators to setthe cache-control to something else than "no-cache". I've drafted acommit that would allow it to be a portal configuration, and submittedI was wondering if anyone knows if there's any reason why this entrywas set to "no-cache" explicitly, and what could be the side effectsof such change.I've debugged it a bit, and it seems that non-asset requests reachesthis code (as in, code that returns an HTML, notimages/css/javascript), so, I don't think this is related to the assets.As a side-question, this configuration option named "Cache Control"might seem a bit cryptic to anyone looking at it without the context,but I haven't figured out a good way to provide a help tip about it.Is there a facility that I could use, to explain what this optiondoes, possibly linking to the RFC that lists all the options?Thanks!Juca.-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJS0ArzAAoJECKM1e+fkPrXfuAH/1LWCfDteoZw6lVEIi2MvtOmEuiGfqA1yPN1DnHT7uKs1tR/dwY/plgDSTHt0HkdA6Y6UOvLXeeLA/1tlv9NTSRNAvM152t1WsoMK7XL7Sn2bEQBgDst7yStk7fwdKdf80vyGkNduTHtcYYSL2rKHsLkzgAmoT0Ib8JBWZI3+yz86e8kN4B56hAf9OLxnVP+HIY5aPVfIjf88ukRpo8Txv2hpy+kz9fl5lTHPnxa3UYiI3iOxcXA5JZno0qmq3q/YLdsMFiBY/cZSE8O3bl1/gqqzs4tNrLCsFyD4psCrHtsPUHdhbWKHSGWHYmg9LYnj58NTBilDzgD5MZx85Vy8vQ==Lium-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----_______________________________________________gatein-dev mailing list