Cheers,

Arnaud

# Arnaud Héritier
# Software Factory Manager
# eXo Platform
# http://www.exoplatform.com
# http://blog.aheritier.net

On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Dimitri <dbaeli@gmail.com> wrote:

The problem here is that the list is moderated. So notification on a moderated list is useless.

+1 for a gatein-hudson list or another solution.

Dimitri
-- eXo Platform France

Le 9 oct. 2009 à 09:53, Arnaud HERITIER <aheritier@gmail.com> a écrit :
Yes but others will reply that they don't want to be SPAM by those emails and prefer to use hudson/jira dashboards or an RSS feed.
In my case, I'm like you, you can SPAM me, I'm a master in managing emails in GMails with emails, filters & more.
Cheers,

Arnaud

# Arnaud Héritier
# Software Factory Manager
# eXo Platform
# http://www.exoplatform.com
# http://blog.aheritier.net
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Julien Viet <julien@julienviet.com> wrote:
for me notifications are fine if they can easily filtered by common mail rules.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Arnaud HERITIER <aheritier@gmail.com> wrote:
FYI, in our continuous integration jobs, Maven checks if there are new SNAPSHOTs on our global repository (Nexus - http://repository.exoplatform.org) for each build.

Actually our central repository checks if there are new SNAPSHOTs on jboss.org every 5 minutes.

Thus if there are less than 5 minutes between the deployment of SNAPSHOTs and the build, it will fail.

This won't occur anymore when all GateIn resources (jobs, repositories, ..) will be hosted on jboss.org

About notifications, it is very very difficult to have all a team agreed on it. That's why we often push them (issues, continuous integration,..) on a dedicated mailing list (notifications@ maven.apache.org for exemple). Thus, those who prefer to use RSS feeds for exemple to retrieve those notifications can use it and not subscribe to the mailing list.

Cheers,

Arnaud

# Arnaud Héritier
# Software Factory Manager
# eXo Platform
# http://www.exoplatform.com
# http://blog.aheritier.net
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Dimitri BAELI <dbaeli@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,

   Last commit broke the build. And will probably block the night team in VN :-)

http://builder.exoplatform.org/hudson/view/All/job/gatein-portal-trunk/97/console

/home/hudson/hudson/jobs/gatein-portal-trunk/workspace/gatein/portal/trunk/component/pc/src/main/java/org/exoplatform/portal/pc/ExoKernelIntegration.java:[133,61] cannot find symbol symbol : variable LOCAL_PORTLET_INVOKER_ID location: interface org.gatein.pc.api.PortletInvoker

Questions:
   How should we behave in such case ?
   Can we rollback the commit if the responsible is not present for few hours ? Or let it be and update to the last known stable state.

Experimentation:
   I'll send the build notifications (only failures and back to normal state) to the gatein-dev list. Tell me if that's not acceptable also.
   Is there another target ML for that ?

The notification rules:

Every failed build triggers a new e-mail.

A successful build after a failed (or unstable) build triggers a new e-mail, indicating that a crisis is over.

An unstable build after a successful build triggers a new e-mail, indicating that there's a regression.

Unless configured, every unstable build triggers a new e-mail, indicating that regression is still there.

Dimitri BAELI - eXo Platform SAS
_______________________________________________
gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
_______________________________________________
gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
_______________________________________________
gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev