> To: "Nick Scavelli" <
nscavell@redhat.com>
> Cc: "gatein-dev" <
gatein-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:12:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [gatein-dev] Performance degradation between JCR 1.14 and 1.15?
>
> same with mysql
>
> On Thu 25 Oct 2012 04:05:52 PM EDT, Nick Scavelli wrote:
> > Using both v1 and v2 I get errors in postgres. Full stacktrace here
> >
http://pastebin.com/BFAMW85M
> >
> > On 10/25/2012 08:43 AM, Nicolas Filotto wrote:
> >> Here is the latest version
> >>
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/20836627/exo.jcr.component.core-1.15.0-CR2-SNAPSHOT-v2.jar
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Matt Wringe <
mwringe@redhat.com
> >> <mailto:
mwringe@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 24/10/12 03:33 PM, Nicolas Filotto wrote:
> >>> Could you please retry with this jar?
> >>
> >> I tested it quickly with the updated jar, and it seems to be
> >> much
> >> closer to the 1.14 results in my test when dealing with 500
> >> pages. I will let Nick comment if it fixes the issues he was
> >> seeing with import/export of sites.
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Nick Scavelli
> >>> <
nscavell@redhat.com <mailto:
nscavell@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Here are results of some quick tests I ran on Friday
> >>> using
> >>> PostgreSQL. Note this is total time spent saving session
> >>> after 500 pages, not time spent indexing.
> >>>
> >>> 1.15: 112.916s, 113.433s, 110.835s
> >>>
> >>> 1.14: 69.711s, 81.118s, 81.680s
> >>>
> >>> For 400 pages (only ran this test once)
> >>> 1.15: 61.503s
> >>> 1.14: 57.856s
> >>>
> >>> And the less pages the more closely 1.15 seems to perform
> >>> close to 1.14. This is a very low sample size, and my
> >>> tests
> >>> might not best paint an accurate picture, but it does
> >>> seem
> >>> that 1.14 consistently out performs 1.15. So take it as
> >>> you
> >>> will. I'm also curious what performance is like if I
> >>> would
> >>> save the session after every page, instead of one large
> >>> commit of 500 pages.
> >>>
> >>> - Nick
> >>>
> >>
> >