+1

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Nick Scavelli <nscavell@redhat.com> wrote:
Not only the burden of doing the mapping and maintaining it, but you also have documentation, and possibly of supporting multiple versions, etc. I would rather support one format starting out and add additional ones if there's a strong need rather then remove a format because a) it's hard to maintain, b) users don't really use one vs the other.


On 04/27/2012 10:38 AM, Julien Viet wrote:
you don't want to do XML because it would be an additional burden to do the object / XML mapping ?

or just because you think XML is so 2000 ?

On Apr 27, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Nick Scavelli wrote:


Sorry, thought I sent this email yesterday...

I created a poll here https://community.jboss.org/polls/1100 for some fun and to discuss about which format to support for the REST API of GateIn. I would recommend people vote and comment, especially if you vote for both :). We can obviously discuss here in more detail. I plan to follow up with some more details on some of my findings thus far after I work out a couple more prototypes.

- Nick

_______________________________________________
gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev


_______________________________________________
gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev




--
Patrice Lamarque
eXo - VP Products