> Cc: "Nick Scavelli" <
nscavell@redhat.com>, "gatein-dev" <
gatein-dev@lists.jboss.org>, "Honza Fnukal"
> <
hfnukal@redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 11:37:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [gatein-dev] Performance degradation between JCR 1.14 and 1.15?
>
> Hi,
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Nicolas Filotto" <
nicolas.filotto@exoplatform.com>
> > To: "Michal Vanco" <
mvanco@redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Nick Scavelli" <
nscavell@redhat.com>, "gatein-dev"
> > <
gatein-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> > Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 10:23:26 AM
> > Subject: Re: [gatein-dev] Performance degradation between JCR 1.14
> > and 1.15?
> >
> > Good, next questions:
> >
> >
> > 1. Where can I get JPP 6.0.0 ER02? Is this
> >
http://intranet.exoplatform.org/rest/jcr/repository/collaboration/Groups/partners/RedHatInc/Documents/Delivery/DevBinaries/EPP/EPP-6/EAP-binary/jboss-eap-6.0.1.ER2.zip
> > what you meant?
>
> No, this is plain EAP, I'm talking about JPP 6.0.0 ER02 build on top
> of EAP 6.0.1 ER03 - Honza should be able to share on intranet with
> you.
>
> > 2. What are the steps to reproduce?
>
> To reproduce first scenario:
> - use attached files
> - add to configuration.xml
> <!-- Configuration for many pages and navigations -->
> <import>war:/conf/portal/manyPagesPortal-configuration.xml</import>
> - place manyPagesPortal-configuration.xml at conf/portal folder
> (using NewPortalConfigListener)
> - copy folders with generated pages/navigations to portal folder
> - copy nullPortletPortalPage.war at standalone/deployments
> (contains very simple hello world portlet which is referenced at
> pages.xml)
> - (I have some extra pages for groups/users, but it's not necessary
> to add)
> - start the portal
> - then do the same with epp 5.2.2 to measure difference
> - difference is at initialization time, then you can verify
> initialized portals - there is big improvement in times when
> accessing portals thanks to new page service I suppose
>
> To reproduce second scenario:
> - use the write portlet I have attached last time - place them
> somewhere at portal and run load test on this page
> - jcr operation (with randon nodes write) is called everytime
> portlet is being rendered, you should be able to compare difference
> with current/old/updated version of portal/jcr
>
> Regards,
> Michal
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Michal Vanco <
mvanco@redhat.com >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi Nick,
> >
> > I'm using MySql 5.5 for portal performance.
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Michal
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >
> > > From: "Nicolas Filotto" <
nicolas.filotto@exoplatform.com >
> > > To: "Michal Vanco" <
mvanco@redhat.com >
> > > Cc: "Nick Scavelli" <
nscavell@redhat.com >, "gatein-dev" <
> > >
gatein-dev@lists.jboss.org >
> > > Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 10:07:12 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [gatein-dev] Performance degradation between JCR
> > > 1.14
> > > and 1.15?
> > >
> > > Michal, same question for you, which db did you use?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Michal Vanco <
mvanco@redhat.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have some feedback on this topic as well.
> > >
> > > I have tried 2 scenarios:
> > > 1) initialization of portal with many pages (server startup time)
> > > 2) jcr portlet (for writing some randon data in jcr) - portlet is
> > > accessed with concurrent users during perf test
> > >
> > > ad 1)
> > > 3 portals with many pages at different structure are initialized
> > > (each portal has +- 780 nodes/pages - [size,height]: [5,4] ,
> > > [27,2]
> > > , [780,1])
> > > - EPP 5.2.2 started at 50m:51s:425ms
> > > - JPP 6.0.0 ER02 started at 5154494ms = 85,9m
> > > - JPP 6.0.0 ER02 with upgraded jcr core started at 5054052ms =
> > > 84,2m
> > >
> > > Accessing these portals is much better at JPP 6 as I have already
> > > mentioned at previous email.
> > >
> > > ad 2)
> > > This is a refreshed scenario we have tested, textlogs from perf
> > > runs
> > > are attached - best results were with epp 5.2.2
> > > For jpp 6, results were slightly better with upgraded jcr core
> > > I'm also attaching jcr portlets which can be reviewed - write
> > > portlet
> > > is used, it adds some random data at jcr when portlet is accessed
> > >
> > > Please keep in mind that it's a comparison of 2 major versions
> > > which
> > > are quite different, but I would expect these scenarios do not
> > > differ too much.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Michal
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >
> > > > From: "Nick Scavelli" <
nscavell@redhat.com >
> > > > To: "Nicolas Filotto" <
nicolas.filotto@exoplatform.com >
> > > > Cc: "Michal Vanco" <
mvanco@redhat.com >, "gatein-dev" <
> > > >
gatein-dev@lists.jboss.org >
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 11:10:03 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [gatein-dev] Performance degradation between JCR
> > > > 1.14
> > > > and 1.15?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Ran some more tests as I saw 1.15 having better numbers for
> > > > pages
> > > > less then 500.
> > > >
> > > > Looks like the new jar is scaling better, and even
> > > > outperforming
> > > > 1.14
> > > > except for 500 pages. Here are the results
http://bit.ly/T2ghPK
> > > > .
> > > > The second tab shows the results for batching commits rather
> > > > then
> > > > waiting and committing 500 pages at once. 1.15 outperforms 1.14
> > > > in
> > > > this scenario as well.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 10/30/2012 03:56 AM, Nicolas Filotto wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do you have new results to provide? Especially on PGSQL?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Nick Scavelli <
> > > >
nscavell@redhat.com
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Some quick tests suggest there seems to be some improvement
> > > > however
> > > > the difference between 1.14 and 1.15 is still there. And it
> > > > still
> > > > seems to be the time that is spent in lucene updating the index
> > > > (IndexWriter#addDocument). With the new jar it seems to
> > > > indicate
> > > > a
> > > > little less time is being spent here, but no where close to the
> > > > time
> > > > spent in JCR1.14.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 10/26/2012 11:31 AM, Nicolas Filotto wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > My mistake jcr.core is not enough you need core.database too,
> > > > you
> > > > can
> > > > get the latest versions from here
> > > >
http://repository.exoplatform.org/content/groups/public/org/exoplatform/jcr/exo.jcr.component.core/1.15.0-GA-SNAPSHOT/exo.jcr.component.core-1.15.0-GA-20121026.152506-7.jar
> > > > and here
> > > >
http://repository.exoplatform.org/content/groups/public/org/exoplatform/core/exo.core.component.database/2.5.0-GA-SNAPSHOT/exo.core.component.database-2.5.0-GA-20121024.105226-1.jar
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Michal Vanco <
> > > >
mvanco@redhat.com
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Same for me with mysql when I was about to try initialization
> > > > of
> > > > manyPages in portal with upgraded jcr core. Log is here:
> > > >
http://pastebin.com/yqTXEbs5
> > > >
> > > > Michal
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Matt Wringe" <
mwringe@redhat.com >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > To: "Nick Scavelli" <
nscavell@redhat.com >
> > > > > Cc: "gatein-dev" <
gatein-dev@lists.jboss.org >
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:12:20 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [gatein-dev] Performance degradation between JCR
> > > > > 1.14
> > > > > and 1.15?
> > > > >
> > > > > same with mysql
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu 25 Oct 2012 04:05:52 PM EDT, Nick Scavelli wrote:
> > > > > > Using both v1 and v2 I get errors in postgres. Full
> > > > > > stacktrace
> > > > > > here
> > > > > >
http://pastebin.com/BFAMW85M
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 10/25/2012 08:43 AM, Nicolas Filotto wrote:
> > > > > >> Here is the latest version
> > > > > >>
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/20836627/exo.jcr.component.core-1.15.0-CR2-SNAPSHOT-v2.jar
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Matt Wringe <
> > > > > >>
mwringe@redhat.com
> > > > > >> <mailto:
mwringe@redhat.com >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On 24/10/12 03:33 PM, Nicolas Filotto wrote:
> > > > > >>> Could you please retry with this jar?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I tested it quickly with the updated jar, and it seems to
> > > > > >> be
> > > > > >> much
> > > > > >> closer to the 1.14 results in my test when dealing with
> > > > > >> 500
> > > > > >> pages. I will let Nick comment if it fixes the issues he
> > > > > >> was
> > > > > >> seeing with import/export of sites.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Nick Scavelli
> > > > > >>> <
nscavell@redhat.com <mailto:
nscavell@redhat.com >>
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Here are results of some quick tests I ran on Friday
> > > > > >>> using
> > > > > >>> PostgreSQL. Note this is total time spent saving session
> > > > > >>> after 500 pages, not time spent indexing.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> 1.15: 112.916s, 113.433s, 110.835s
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> 1.14: 69.711s, 81.118s, 81.680s
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> For 400 pages (only ran this test once)
> > > > > >>> 1.15: 61.503s
> > > > > >>> 1.14: 57.856s
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> And the less pages the more closely 1.15 seems to perform
> > > > > >>> close to 1.14. This is a very low sample size, and my
> > > > > >>> tests
> > > > > >>> might not best paint an accurate picture, but it does
> > > > > >>> seem
> > > > > >>> that 1.14 consistently out performs 1.15. So take it as
> > > > > >>> you
> > > > > >>> will. I'm also curious what performance is like if I
> > > > > >>> would
> > > > > >>> save the session after every page, instead of one large
> > > > > >>> commit of 500 pages.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> - Nick
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > gatein-dev mailing list
> > > > >
gatein-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > > > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > gatein-dev mailing list
> > > >
gatein-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >