On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:59 PM, John Doyle <jdoyle@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Heiko W.Rupp <hrupp@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I was able to make some progress with Dockerizing Hawkular-services
> More technical details below
>
> As it is relatively hard (not impossible) to do stuff like adding a user
> inside a (immutable) docker container or to edit standalone.xml to
> enable the agent, we need to decide how we add the (default) user
> to hawkular docker container and also if/how to enable the embedded
> agent.
>
> Also as we more understand hawkular-services as one package,
> we should perhaps figure out if we really need the flexibility to
> modify standalone.xml on the fly with all our snippets and templates
> or if we create a 'hardcoded' one that can be used for the process
> going forward.

Very few layered products have created their own dedicated
standalone.xml. To be honest I don't understand the reluctance.
Configuration changes in maintenance releases are rejected unless
absolutely needed for security purposes, so breakage is very unlikely.


+1