Yes, of course, that's the usefulness of loggers, but that doesn't mean system println is worse than INFO logging in test code. Meaning, to the point of adding checkstyle misery.

On 1/27/2016 9:13 AM, Peter Palaga wrote:
Loggers unlike printlns offer some control over topics to log and their 
individual verbosities. In other words it is possible to turn on 
detailed logging for a test that makes problems, and turn off all 
others. -- P

On 2016-01-27 15:05, Thomas Segismont wrote:
I don't know the motivation of the JIRA, but as far as I'm concerned, I
prefer usage of loggers so that I can have tests verbose in CI but quiet
locally.

Le 27/01/2016 14:58, Juraci Paixão Kröhling a écrit :
Good question. In general, I quite like when tests write some debugging
information to stdout/stderr , so that tools like Jenkins can record the
output that each specific test had.

- Juca.

On 27.01.2016 14:55, Jay Shaughnessy wrote:
Just out of curiosity, i'm not against a change, but what is the reason
to not have printlns, the jira just says "should not have" and doesn't
state the misfortune that befalls their use.

On 1/27/2016 4:44 AM, Peter Palaga wrote:
Hi *,

Short version: How to configure the log levels for individual
jboss.logging loggers in tests run by maven outside the container?

Long version:
I was recently assignedhttps://issues.jboss.org/browse/HAWKULAR-264  Add
println checks to the checkstyle. It says that "Tests shouldn't be
allowed to have printlns, we should enforce this via the checkstyle plugin."

I fully agree for tests being run on the server side - those can use
JBoss Logging in the very same manner as the server code.

However, what is the best replacement for println()s in tests that are
run outside the server?

I tried using JBoss Logging there too but I failed completely to find a
way to configure the log levels for individual loggers. Does anybody
know how to do that?

To get my work done without using printlns, I started to use
java.util.logging configured via logging.properties :
https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-agent/blob/master/hawkular-wildfly-agent-itest-parent/hawkular-wildfly-agent-itest/src/test/resources/logging.properties

So what should be the replacement for printlns in tests?

Thanks,

Peter
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev



_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev

_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev

_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev

_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev