+1 on the format and hawkular/hawkular-wildfly-agent (renaming sucks but we're still young enough to allow this)

But we still need to decide betwen Openshift vs Kubernetes.

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Heiko W.Rupp <hrupp@redhat.com> wrote:

On 19 Oct 2016, at 15:24, John Mazzitelli wrote:

> OK, so if we use Hawkular Kubernetes Agent then the gitrepo would be named:
>
> hawkular/hawkular-kubernetes-agent

Sounds good to me

_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev