+1 to the verbose naming, it's totally clear if we just do it that way.

On 10/19/2016 9:39 AM, John Mazzitelli wrote:
OK, so if we use Hawkular Kubernetes Agent then the gitrepo would be named:

hawkular/hawkular-kubernetes-agent

Sounds good to me

And the executable name? The name we call it in code and in logging messages?

Based on what people are saying, I'm just going to call the executable "hawkular-kubernetes-agent" and have for example "hawkular-kubernetes-agent.go" and when logging needs to name it call it "Hawkular Kubernetes Agent"

This is what I was getting at - I wasn't asking for the "product name" (we can call it anything we want and it doesn't affect me at this point in time :) but what are we to call it in the code, for logging messages, executable names, github repo, etc. I'm fine with "hawkular-kubernetes-agent" and everything that entails if that is what people want.

_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev