Was looking at the wikipedia page for APM: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_performance_management

Their definition (conceptual framework) includes user defined 'business transactions' as well, which fits with the project - so possibly Hawkular APM.

Although if inclusion of 'performance' maybe indicates too much of an IT tool, rather than a tool for IT and Business, then possibly Hawkular App Manager?

----- Original Message -----
> Extracting some ideas from MiQ.
>
> They uses the term "Performace" as a wider concept that is focus in the
> health of the system.
>
> So how it sounds
>
>  - Hawkular App Performance
>  - Hawkular Business Performance ?
>
>
>
> ----- Mensaje original -----
> > De: "Thomas Heute" <theute@redhat.com>
> > Para: "Discussions around Hawkular development"
> > <hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> > Enviados: Viernes, 27 de Mayo 2016 11:11:19
> > Asunto: Re: [Hawkular-dev] BTM or not BTM, that is the question
> >
> > I would favor a renaming to "Hawkular <Something>" if we had an idea for a
> > name that encapsulate the 3 notions... (I don't). I agree that BTM is
> > confusing now.
> >
> > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Gary Brown < gbrown@redhat.com > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > As discussed in the recent blog (and demo), Hawkular BTM now provides
> > Application Performance Management (APM), Distributed Tracing (DT) and
> > Business Transaction Management (BTM).
> >
> > The project was initially started to address the third area, hence being
> > called BTM - however BTM requires the collection of the information used to
> > provide APM and DT - and providing those other views on the information is
> > useful to users.
> >
> > Due to the wider scope, just wondering whether the BTM name is now
> > misleading. If a project component rename was considered a good idea, then
> > now would probably be the best time to do it, before getting close to a
> > stable 1.0 version?
> >
> > So two questions:
> >
> > 1) Is a component rename a good idea?
> >
> > 2) If so, any suggestions for a name, either some generic term that
> > encapsulates APM, DT and BTM - or alternatively a completely unrelated name
> > (but then it would not follow the pattern used by other Hawkular
> > components).
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Gary
> > _______________________________________________
> > hawkular-dev mailing list
> > hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > hawkular-dev mailing list
> > hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev