On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling <jpkroehling@redhat.com> wrote:
On 03.02.2016 12:25, Thomas Heute wrote:
IMO going to Wildfly management tools to configure Hawkular is IMO not a
great experience.

IMO for Hawkular users, Wildfly is an internal detail and its complexity
should be relatively hidden.

That's a valid point. The counter point, to me, is that if/when Hawkular adds the possibility to manage this aspect of Wildfly (properties), we get Hawkular support for free :) Hawkular managing itself!

If needed, yes but I don't see how one exclude the other one.

Thomas
 

- Juca.