- The code is currently specific to Wildfly ? (Would not work for Fuse on Karaf or should be modified ?)- The playbooks are not part of Hawkular-services so they would be added separately ? Or hawkular-services would be less and less generic / more and more related to the MW Manager ?- the code should not be in common (actually the whole commands-gateway doesn't belong to commons if we consider that commons was supposed to be shared among Alert/Metrics/APM/Services)- we have a cyclic dependency(with commons and inventory)If I read fast and correctly it seems that:I'm questioning the packaging and dependencies, Rubens spent some time a while back and we need to resume/conclude:with Ansible in the Middleware Manager ?- Find Wildfly servers and instrument them with the agentI'd like to resume the discussion as how we will enable the following features:- Start a server/domain
https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-commons/pull/83/files
https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-commons/pull/83/ files#diff- dd195df81855017bb54e44d7c140c0 4fR72
Note: While I am not directly suggesting Hawkular Services to be more specialized as the middleware manager, it may be something we would want.
Hawkular for Manage IQ (currently hawkular-services) and Hawkular for Kubernetes/OpenShift (currently HAM), the first should extend the second so that one could just use the first as MW Manager and solution for OpenShift.
It would simplify development and message.Thomas