+1
I changed last week the description of 2 repositories to show OBSOLETE in the list view for that reason (-nest and -bus)
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Jay Shaughnessy <jshaughn@redhat.com> wrote:
This seems like a good thing, a place for stuff to live, as an example or reference, or possibly to be revived later. Pinger and avail_creator may be good candidates as well.
On 4/29/2016 12:42 PM, John Mazzitelli wrote:
I would like to propose a new organization in Github to host projects that no longer receive development. "Hawkular-Archive" seems a good name for this purpose. The goal is to keep the main Hawkular org focused on important projects and at the same time preserve work that was already done but away from the main organization. >From a quick look at the current organization here are two repositories that can be moved right away: hawkular-metrics-openshift (Openshit 2.x cartridge for Hawkular Metrics 0.2.7 or earlier) and hawkular-bus (code moved to another repo). Am I am sure we can find other repositories to move. In the long run we can develop some criteria for archiving projects but for now we can just do a one-time major cleanup. Any repositories that should be archived right away? Any other suggestions for a name? Any thoughts on the idea in general?This should be archived - it is obsolete - this was what the hawkular-agent grew out of, but this wildfly-monitor is no longer needed. https://github.com/hawkular/wildfly-monitor _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev