Agreed, Hawkular Services need more love, not to disappear.

It may be renamed to "Hawkular ManageIQ Provider" on the website if that helps with clarity, but shouldn't disappear.

Also there is no quickstart anymore, it's very rough for people.

We had this:

http://www.hawkular.org/hawkular-services/docs/quickstart-guide/

Not perfect, but should be improved rather than removed IMO.

In fact, the whole overview has disappeared:

http://www.hawkular.org/overview/

Alerting has quickstarts that should be more prominent on the website: https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-alerts/blob/master/examples/tutorial/README.adoc

Thomas

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Heiko Rupp <hrupp@redhat.com> wrote:

Hey,

On 3 Jul 2017, at 23:42, Stefan Negrea wrote:

> I waited about 2 weeks to allow enough time for feedback. There was a
> good amount of initial discussion on the document mostly in the form
> of proposals to enhance the initial plan. There were zero negative
> comments and nobody opposed the plan.

I know I did not chime in on the document, so have no right
to complain now :-)

I think though that the removal of Hawkular Services is wrong.
It may indeed at the moment only exist for that one consumer,
which is ManageIQ, but not listing it is in my opinion also
confusing. Instead of removing it, we should perhaps better
educate visitors of the web site (in a graphical way?) how this
relates to the other projects.
Similar to Tracing. This is no longer Hawkular APM, so it is right
not to list Hawkular APM, but so far Tracing folks are still under the
Hawkular umbrella and the blog contains a lot of content about it.
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev