I mostly have concerns about having docs spread over multiple solutions. But if the plan is to move all to gitbook, it should be ok.

Also we should still use AsciiDoc (I see that gitbook supports AscissDoc and Markdown)

Thomas

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Gary Brown <gbrown@redhat.com> wrote:

Hi

Wondering if gitbooks was ever considered for the documentation? Seems ideal as we can version each book with the component(s) it relates to, and users can download a pdf version for use offline.

Was thinking about experimenting with it for the updated APM docs?

Any objections?

Regards
Gary
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev