On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:00 PM, mike thompson <mithomps@redhat.com> wrote:

On Oct 7, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Jay Shaughnessy <jshaughn@redhat.com> wrote:

no objection from me.

On 10/7/2016 12:17 PM, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
Hey,

ManageIQ is using Ruby 2.2.4+ and Ruby 2.0 is
pretty old now (Jruby 9.1.x is Ruby 2.3+), so
I would like to no longer "support" Ruby 2.0.
For the time being that only means that
we do not test against 2.0 anymore in Travis.

What do people think?
Yes! No need for these older versions.
What about 2.1 ?
Why stop there? Why not 2.2? Since current version is 2.3 (which ships in Red Hat Software Collections).
+1
 

  Heiko
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev


_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev


_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev