Yes! No need for these older versions.On Oct 7, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Jay Shaughnessy <jshaughn@redhat.com> wrote:no objection from me.
On 10/7/2016 12:17 PM, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
Hey, ManageIQ is using Ruby 2.2.4+ and Ruby 2.0 is pretty old now (Jruby 9.1.x is Ruby 2.3+), so I would like to no longer "support" Ruby 2.0. For the time being that only means that we do not test against 2.0 anymore in Travis. What do people think?Why stop there? Why not 2.2? Since current version is 2.3 (which ships in Red Hat Software Collections).What about 2.1 ?
______________________________Heiko _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/ mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
_________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev